In defense of fax

I often hear people complaining about the continued use of fax in the 21st century. No one can accuse me of being an  old-tech-hanger-on. I'm usually an early adopter (but not the earliest) of new tech. But there are some nice features and use-cases of fax that still keep it relevant in the 21st century.

Privacy

Fax is considerably more private than email. The default method of fax only leaves a copy with the sender and the receiver (assuming they have an un-hacked fax machine). There are no copies stored on any servers for hackers or state actors to get.

Furthermore, the government (at least in the US) needs a warrant to wire-tap and capture the fax.

Convenience

When you need a hard-copy anyways, it's a lot fewer steps. It automatically pops out!

It's a lot easier on the sending side as well. Making a scanner work on the sending side is also non-trivial. I have two scanners at my home. Both require special driver and software from the manufacturer to be installed on my computer. It's a chore to install and keep them updated. Fax doesn't require a driver.

Downsides of Fax

Faxes do have downsides, but not inherent to their operation. These could be worked around by updating the standards:

  1. No authentication makes it easy to spoof
  2. There is no encryption by default, which is the same security as voice communication, which is none (that even applies to the trivial cracked cell-phone voice encryption). But you could buy special encrypted fax machines.

In conclusion, fax has it's place in the 21st century, with a few caveats.

links

social